What is wrong with believing isn repression?

What's wrong with believing in repression?

A review for legal professionals

Piper, August; Lillevik, Linda; Kritzer, Roxanne -
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. Vol 14 (3), August 2008, 223-242.

Abstract

1. Some courts in recent years have tarnished their credibility by willingly and blindly adopting the theory of repressed memory. Such acceptance can destroy the reputations of falsely accused individuals, and, by failing to pay due attention to scientific evidence, gives
credence to pseudoscience and demeans the scientific method.

This paper was written to inform judges and attorneys about the relevant evidence, which shows that:

	(a) the concepts of repressed and recovered memory are not generally accepted in the psychological and psychiatric community;
	(b) the studies cited to support these concepts reveal significant flaws;
	(c) much empirical evidence has been accumulated against the theory of repression;
	(d) the studies using the best methodology offer the least support for the repression hypothesis; and
	(e) there is no evidence that recovered memories accurately reveal the specifics of long-ago events.

Repressed- and recovered-memory theory is not supported by science.