Overview of Samples Used by Rind et al. ( 1998) to Determine
Effect of Consent on CSA-Adjustment Relations in Male College Students
  
  
[Page 724]
Study
|
Con-
tact
|
Res-
ponse
|
Definitions of CSA a
|
Dependent measures
|
Prevalence and effect sizes b
|
N
|
CSA (%)
|
rc
|
| Sample that
specified CSA had to be unwanted |
| Bendixen et al., 1994 |
B |
U |
< 18 |
Complaints (lA) |
486 |
3 |
.26 |
| Collings, 1995 |
B |
U |
< 18 |
BSI |
284 |
29 |
.29 |
| Rau, 1994 |
B |
U |
< 12 W/5+; 12-16 W/10+ |
PFQ, HSF-MMPI, FSSS |
60 |
- |
10 |
| Rew et al., 1991 |
B |
U |
< 18 w/older partner |
SES. JCS. GWBS |
160 |
22 |
.16 |
|
"All types" (assumed by Rind et al. to
contain wanted experiences) |
| Finkelhor, 1979, 1984 |
B |
M |
<13 w/> 16; 13-16 w/10+
(relative or unwanted) |
FSSS |
260 |
7 |
.23 |
| Fishrnan, 1991 |
B |
M |
<13 w/5+;o 13-16 w/10+ or unwanted |
SSD |
148 |
21 |
.12 |
| Fromuth & Burkhart, 1989 [MW] |
B |
A |
<13 w/5+ or > 16; 13-16 w/10+ |
SCL-90, BDI-SF, LCS. RSES |
249 |
15 |
.18 |
| Fromuth & Burkhart, 1989 [SE] |
B |
A |
<13 w/5+ or > 16; 13-16 w/10+ |
SCL-90, BDI-SF, LCS. RSES |
324 |
13 |
.01 |
| Greenwald, 1994 |
B |
M |
<16 w/5+; > 16 w/10+; unwanted; intra-familial |
RSSS |
111 |
9 |
-.22 |
| Hatfield, 1988 |
C |
A |
<14 w/5+ |
HSCL-Mod |
213 |
12 |
.14 |
| Predieri, 1992 |
B |
A |
<13 w/5+; 13-16 w/8+; force; authority
figure |
DSFl, MMPI-Sc5 |
62 |
- |
.09 |
| Preuss, 1988 |
B |
A |
<13 w/5+; 13-17 w/10+; force |
MAST, bulimia (IA) |
288 |
20 |
.09 |
| Sarbo,1985 |
B |
M |
<12 w/> 16; <16 w/relative > 16;
unwanted |
CAQ |
112 |
24 |
.12 |
| Urquiza,1989 |
C |
A |
<18 w/5+ |
SC, TSCS, MAST |
88 |
- |
.19 |
Note
Subjective perceptions were not included.
Dashes indicate that values were not applicable.
CSA = child sexual abuse;
B = both contact and
noncontact;
U = only unwanted sex
included in the definition;
IA = investigator-authored item;
BSI = Brief Symptom Inventory (Derogatis
& Spencer. 1982);
PFQ = Psychosexual Functioning Questionnaire
(Schover,
Friedman. Weiler, Heinman, & LoPiccolo, 1982);
HSF-MMPI = Hugo Shon Form of the MMPI (Hugo, 1971);
FSSS = Finkelhor Sexual Self-Esteem Scale (Finkelhor,
1984);
SES = Self-Efficacy Scale (Sherer et al..
1982
JCS = Jalowiec Coping Scale (Jalowiec,
1988);
GWBS = General Well-Being Schedule (McDowell. & Newell. 1987)
M = mixed, unwanted experiences
are included in the definition for older age groups;
SSD = Sexual Self-Esteem and Dysfunction (IA);
MW = Midwestern sample;
A = all types of sexual
experiences, unwanted and wanted;
SCL-90 = Symptom Checklist (Derogatis. Lipman. & Covi. 1973);
BDI-SF = Beck Depression Inventory-Shon Form
(Beck, Ward.
Mendelson, Mock. & Erbaugh, 1961);
LCS = Locus of Control Scale (Coleman et al., 1996);
RSES = Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965);
SE = Southeastern sample;
RSSS = Romantic and Sexual Self-EsteemScale (Reed, 1988);
C = contact only;
HSCL-Mod = Hopkins Symptom Check List-Modified
(Briere & Runtz.
1985; Derogatis, Lipman, Rickels, Ulenhuth, & Covi. 1974);
DSFl = Derogatis Sexual Functioning Inventory (Derogatis
& Melisaratos. 1979);
MMPI-Sc5 = Masculinity-Feminity Scale (Scale 5) of the Minnesota Multiphasic
Personality Inventory (Hathaway & McKinley. 1967);
MAST = Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (Brady, Foulks, Childress,
& Penschuk. 1982)
CAQ = Clinical Analysis Questionnaire (Cattell. 1973);
SC = Symptom Checklist (Briere.
1984);
TSCS = Tennessee Self-Concept Scale (Fitts. 1964).
a Upper age of child
is given first; then minimum age of perpetrator is given (e.g.. w/5 +
= with someone at least 5 years older); last, other conditions for CSA are
given.
b Ns are number
of participants in analyses of psychological correlates of CSA, effect sizes are
at the sample level, and rcs are point-bi-serial effect sizes
corrected for base-rate differences of CSA but not dichotomization.
|
