INTRODUCTION
John Money, Ph.D.
For those born and educated after the year
2000, we will be their history, and they will be mystified by our
self-imposed, moralistic ignorance of the principles of sexual and
erotic development in childhood. We who are today presiding over the
demise of the twentieth century are defiantly proud of our ability to
deny that sexual health has a developmental history that, like every
other aspect of healthy functioning in adolescence and maturity, begins
in childhood. We safeguard ourselves against evidence to the contrary by
failing to fund basic pediatric sexological research, and by repudiating
the findings of those who fund themselves.
In all of Europe and America, as well as
everywhere else in the world, there exists no specialty division,
clinic, or service dedicated to pediatric sexological health and
pathology. Nor does there exist an ephebiatric (adolescent) clinic for
teenaged sexual health and its maintenance; and there is also no
completely comprehensive Department or Institute of Sexual Medicine and
Research in any medical school.
The importance of the juvenile years in
laying the developmental foundations of sexual health in maturity has
been demonstrated in experimental studies of subhuman primates. If
rhesus monkeys are reared in social isolation, they are deprived of
normal age-mate play, which in the critical years of their early
childhood, includes sexual rehearsal play. The outcome of this early
deprivation is that they are permanently sexually impaired. When they
reach adulthood they are unable to position themselves in mating, even
with a gentle and cooperative partner, and they do not reproduce their
kind.
To the extent that one can conjecture from
one species to another, this finding would appear to have profound
implications for the significance of juvenile sexual rehearsal play in
the development of sexual health in our own children. It might very well
be that deprivation of playful sexual rehearsal is the origin of a high
proportion of the sexual syndromes of human adolescence and adulthood.
it surely should be self-evident that we need a basic science of
pediatric sexology, so as to have the actual data on which to base a
sound policy of rearing children to be sexually healthy. There is, for
example, a need for more data on the effects of age matching and age
discrepancy in sexual rehearsal play. Most adults enjoy cuddling and
caressing children, and children respond, reciprocally. Most adults
however, do not respond to this type of intimacy by getting sexually and
erotically aroused. Indeed, they may be quite incapable of arousal by
someone too young. For them there is no overlap between parental love
and sexual love.
Exactly the opposite is true in the case of
adolescents and adults, male or female, heterosexual, bisexual or
homosexual, who have the sexological syndrome of pedophilia. In the
adulthood of the true pedophile, parental love is hybridized, so to
speak, with sexual love. The adult pedophile continues to have the
erotosexual status of a juvenile and is attracted toward, and attractive
to juveniles. Likewise, the true ephebophile has an adolescent
erotosexual status and is attracted toward, and attractive to teenagers.
Conversely, juveniles and teenagers are attracted to the way their older
lovers treat them as equals.
Pedophilia and ephebophilia are no more a
matter of voluntary choice than are left-handedness or color blindness.
There is no known method of treatment by which they may be effectively
and permanently altered, suppressed, or replaced. Punishment is useless.
There is no satisfactory hypothesis, evolutionary or otherwise, as to
why they exist in nature's overall scheme of things. One must simply
accept the fact that they do exist, and then, with optimum
enlightenment, formulate a policy of what to do about it.
Herein lies the significance of Theo
Sandfort's book. The most important thing about it, first and foremost,
is that it exists as a source of information relevant to a vexacious and
disputed issue in pediatric and ephebiatric sexological ethics. No
matter that it may constitute only one wall of an unfinished edifice:
its great scientific merit is that it does constitute that one wall on
and around which more may be built. It is a very important book, and a
very positive one.
The timeliness of Dr. Sandfort's book is
that its findings predate the appearance of a new variable, one that
will influence all of human sexological research henceforth, namely the
epidemic spread of AIDS. It is a book that catches a moment in history
which will never be repeated, certainly not until a method of prevention
is found. It provides sexological science and policy with information of
great pertinence in helping to shape the future wisely. The way this
information will be used in public policy regarding the sexual rights of
children will be subject to widespread dispute. There is no arguing,
however, that the information does exist, and that it is factually and
accurately recorded. It makes Boys on their Contacts with Men: a Study
of Sexually Expressed Friendships a very valuable book. It is must
reading for all those interested in the development of sexuality in
childhood.